Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Hardware reccomendation

[Ivo van Heel]

> Computational speed, and cache size seem to be the most important
> factors.  But anything you buy today will have no problem encoding
> (even with "lame -h") at faster than real time.  
> My 600mhz athalon is about 5x.

It seems strange that my old Pentium 133MHz (hey, it's the best I've got at
the moment *smiles weakly*) does so bad a job, taking up hours and hours for
one album. I'd say it does about 0.3x with lame, but I've heard people say
their Pentium II 200MHz does realtime?

Ivo

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )