Ivo van Heel schrieb am Fre, 05 Mai 2000:
> > Computational speed, and cache size seem to be the most important
> > factors. But anything you buy today will have no problem encoding
> > (even with "lame -h") at faster than real time.
> > My 600mhz athalon is about 5x.
>
> It seems strange that my old Pentium 133MHz (hey, it's the best I've got at
> the moment *smiles weakly*) does so bad a job, taking up hours and hours for
> one album. I'd say it does about 0.3x with lame, but I've heard people say
> their Pentium II 200MHz does realtime?
>
> Ivo
Depending on the content to encode, I get these rates on my
old Pentium 166 (200) MMX, LAME 3.80 with gcc 2.95.2 compiled,
SuSE6.3 Linux:
CBR: 1.0 - 1.2 avg. 1.05
VBR: 0.25 - 0.4 avg. 0.31
with DOS and Intel compiler it's slightly slower, the M$ (VC 4.2) compiled
version is a few percent slower than the Linux one.
Robert
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
homepage: http://linux.unixcity.de/catwalk/index.html
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
