Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame: quant_compare

[John Hayward-Warburton]

Alfred Weyers wrote:

> 2) experimentalX=6 (Robert's?) achieves the highest quality (for my
> liking).

Same here, particularly on choral music in a large, cathedral-like acoustic. Less
burble.
John HW


--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )