> > I was under the impression that VBR mode was better...so I have been trying > to use it. But at this point I have absolutely no idea if what I'm encoding > is better than CBR mode or not. I have absolutely no idea if I'm using a > good set of options or not. I'll probably just wait until lame is more > finished before I encode any more. Good luck guys. > > -steve I do all my testing at 128kbs and lower, and I still feel that 128kbs CBR is on average better than VBR (128kbs average) At higher bitrates, (see r3mix.net for example), there is some evidence that VBR outperforms CBR. But this is mostly based on signal processing tests - not hearing tests. hearing tests are hard to perform at such high bitrates because everything sounds pretty good, and I think the evidence is not conclusive either way. Mark -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Joshua Bahnsen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Gabriel Bouvigne
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Joshua Bahnsen
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Jason Antony
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Steve Schow
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Ivo
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Steve Schow
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Steve Schow
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Mark Taylor
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR c... Steve Schow
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR c... Don Melton
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR c... David
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR c... Don Melton
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR c... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR c... Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR c... Ivo
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] new VB... Roel VdB
- RE: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] ne... Steve Schow
- Re[4]: [MP3 ENCODER] new VB... Roel VdB