> As noted in the other post, I, and many with me have very little to > complain about in with the <=3.85 vbr_rh mode... Cannot find any > glitches since 3.83, encoded a few hundreth albums and counting... So wait, I'm not quite understanding you. Are you saying I should stick with 3.83, or are you saying I should upgrade to 3.85 for the best VBR mode encoding? > -- > MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ ) > -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Steve Schow
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Mark Taylor
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Steve Schow
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Don Melton
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code David
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Don Melton
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Ivo
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Roel VdB
- Re[4]: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Steve Schow
- Re[4]: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Roel VdB
- [MP3 ENCODER] Lame development matures ... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame development matures ... Monty
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame development matures ... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame development matures ... Twinkles
- [MP3 ENCODER] The "-b128" bug in 386 ag... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] The "-b128" bug in 38... Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] The "-b128" bug in 38... David
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] The "-b128" bug in 38... Robert Hegemann
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] The "-b128" bug in... Roel VdB