> > I'd vote for limiting it to 8205. The quality loss would be very minimal. It > > won't solve winamp's problem, but it's easy to fix in the decoder, now that > > we know exactly what the problem is. > > The advantage is that 8205 is 0x1FFE, which is not a valid syncword for > > mpeg1-2. With this, audio resync on corrupted bitstreams would be easier for > > the decoder > > > Isn't 0xFFE a MPEG-2.5 sync word? Yes it is. But mpeg versions can't be mixed in a bitstream. So yes, it wouldn't change the situation for mpeg 2.5, but I think that it's used a lot less than mpeg 1-2. Regards, -- Gabriel Bouvigne - France [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobile phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 12138873 MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED! Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED! Naoki Shibata
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED! Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED! Naoki Shibata
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED! Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED! Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED! Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLV... Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED! Youri Pepplinkhuizen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED! Mark Taylor
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLV... alex . broadhead
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLV... Frank Klemm
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED! Youri Pepplinkhuizen
- [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED! Dmitry