On Donnerstag 27 Dezember 2007, Hans Meine wrote: > [...] I noticed that files I encoded recently with lame 3.97 have > the correct number of (audio data-only) MPA frames set, but the total byte > count includes the Xing tag [itself]. > > Is lame's behaviour in this respect documented anywhere (ideally for > specific versions)? > > Is there a rationale for including the Xing tag in the byte count, but not > in the frame count? > > Do you disagree with my own opinion that the Xing tag should be excluded > from both values?
Now that I hope most people have returned from their christmas/new year holidays, does noone have an opinion on this? Ciao, / / .o. /--/ ..o / / ANS ooo _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder