On Jan 9, 5:39 pm, "Jason Martin" <jason.worth.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, > I'd like to get rid of NAILS support. It adds a huge amount of > complication, and I haven't seen it actually pan out for any modern > processor. > > I vote for leaving the existing NAILS code alone, but explicitly > stating that NAILS is not supported. Perhaps, if we do discover some > use for it, it might be worth the extra effort to go back and support > it. Yep, I can get on board with that. Given the number of bugs found in NAILS support recently by just compiling with odd values or something larger than 2 tells me that it isn't working to well. David reported some of the issues, so maybe he has good reasons for keeping it around. > Jason Worth Martin > Asst. Professor of Mathematicshttp://www.math.jmu.edu/~martin > Cheers, Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
