Actually NAILS=1 isn't so hot either. :-) 2009/1/10 mabshoff <michael.absh...@mathematik.uni-dortmund.de>: > > > On Jan 9, 5:39 pm, "Jason Martin" <jason.worth.mar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > >> I'd like to get rid of NAILS support. It adds a huge amount of >> complication, and I haven't seen it actually pan out for any modern >> processor. >> >> I vote for leaving the existing NAILS code alone, but explicitly >> stating that NAILS is not supported. Perhaps, if we do discover some >> use for it, it might be worth the extra effort to go back and support >> it. > > Yep, I can get on board with that. Given the number of bugs found in > NAILS support recently by just compiling with odd values or something > larger than 2 tells me that it isn't working to well. > > David reported some of the issues, so maybe he has good reasons for > keeping it around. > >> Jason Worth Martin >> Asst. Professor of Mathematicshttp://www.math.jmu.edu/~martin >> > > Cheers, > > Michael > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
