> My feeling, looking through your code is that: > > * It really sits *on top of* the mpz layer > * It relies on some code for single limbs that is not abstracted > anywhere in MPIR, but should be > > It should: > > * be implemented *in* the new mpir_n layer > * the unsigned long portion should be abstracted out into a new long > layer (just as there is a longlong.h, there should be a long.c and > long.h) > Yesterday using binary splitting method but with zero other optimizations I've written a code for factorial (mpz_fac_ui in gmp) in also mpz layer, but it was slower by about only 40%. By some optimizations it would be about 10% slower. I think that none of the uploaded 4 codes would be much faster in mpn layer, because currently gmp is also using a binary splitting idea for factorial, but in mpn layer.
But I'd also be interested to know, have you ever written > anything for the mpn layer, and would you be interested in working on > some code at that level, to help us towards our goals there. I have written 0 code in mpn. And this is really not my plan to learn it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
