On Feb 7, 3:09 pm, Case Vanhorsen <cas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Cactus <rieman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This would also be a significant task but it would solve this problem
> > once and for all.
>
> It does keep the API from growing. I can see it working with
> statically linked applications (like gmpy) but wouldn't there be DLL
> issues if two dynamically linked applications assumed different
> interfaces?
Only the application that made the wrong assumption :-)
Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
