On Thursday 03 March 2011 16:06:14 Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Jason <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote:
> > As we don't seem to have any regressions from mpir-2.2 , I think we can
> > release 2.3 this evening.
> 
> I'm running the test script now that I know it exists (thanks).  Is
> there a known issue with fat builds with GCC 3.4.x on K8
> (k8-unknown-linux-gnu)?  This is what I get:
> 
> PASSED CC=gcc CXX=g++ configure=
> PASSED CC=gcc CXX=g++ configure= --enable-cxx --enable-gmpcompat
> PASSED CC=gcc CXX=g++ configure= --enable-cxx --enable-gmpcompat
> --enable-assert --enable-alloca=debug
> PASSED CC=gcc CXX=g++ configure= --enable-cxx --enable-gmpcompat
> --enable-assert --enable-alloca=debug --build=none-unknown-linux-gnu
> FAILED CC=gcc CXX=g++ configure= --enable-fat
> 
> The error:
> 
> /usr/bin/ld: mpn/.libs/fat_entry.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against
> `_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' can not be used when making a shared object;
> recompile with -fPIC
> mpn/.libs/fat_entry.o: could not read symbols: Bad value
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]: *** [libmpir.la] Error 1

This also happens on mpir 2.2 and 2.1  see 

http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-
devel/browse_thread/thread/b497c224ed505dc3/b72e01cf69c7b1fb?lnk=gst&q=_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_#b72e01cf69c7b1fb

if you do
gcc -v
what is the exact output , perhaps when gcc was built some different option was 
used , we have quite a few gcc-3.4's on various machines and they all work fine 
, although some have broken c++


Jason

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to