I'm wondering, is it safe to re-use the same structure as both the first
and second arguments to mpz_...() functions...
For example, is the idiom:
void addthenshift(mpz_t &mp,unsigned a,unsigned s)
{
mpz_add_ui(mp,mp,a);
mpz_mul_2exp(mp,mp,s);
}
always safe? Or, is it necessary to introduce two temporaries? Would
the answer be the same if I replaced "unsigned a" with "const mpz_t &a)
and mpz_add_ui with mpz_add? I've looked in the pdf manual (18 December
2010) - but can't find an explicit answer.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
