On 10/03/2011 14:21, Bill Hart wrote: > On 10 March 2011 13:07, Steve <sjh_goo...@shic.co.uk> wrote: >> I'm wondering, is it safe to re-use the same structure as both the first >> and second arguments to mpz_...() functions... > Yes, that is always safe, unless it is explicitly documented otherwise. Thanks for the clarification... I'd tried a few test cases, and they seemed to work - I just preferred to be cautious and assume that I couldn't trust it was OK unless I could find documentation saying so. > I don't understand the question. > An mpz is a completely different structure to an unsigned machine integer... I think you've over-analysed...
I just wanted to extend the question from mpz_add_ui() - which might have been a special case - to include a more general one, too. It felt odd to pass the same value as the first two parameters - that's all. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
