On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Case Van Horsen <cas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Case Van Horsen <cas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> I've gone through all the files and there are only the two extra
>>> symbols defined in mulfunc asm files which aren't provided by generic
>>> code.
>>>
>>> I also think we should be appending these #undefs on 64 bit as well.
>>> The reason is that we are removing the assembly files irrespective of
>>> ABI.
>>>
>>> So I think the following:
>>>
>>> if %ABI% == 32 (echo #undef HAVE_NATIVE_mpn_mod_1c >> ..\config.h)
>>> if %ABI% == 32 (echo #undef HAVE_NATIVE_mpn_divrem_1c >> ..\config.h)
>>>
>>> should be
>>>
>>> echo #undef HAVE_NATIVE_mpn_mod_1c >> ..\config.h
>>> echo #undef HAVE_NATIVE_mpn_divrem_1c >> ..\config.h
>>> echo #define HAVE_NATIVE_mpn_mod_1c 0 >> ..\config.h
>>> echo #define HAVE_NATIVE_mpn_divrem_1c 0 >> ..\config.h
>>>
>>> I am pretty sure we also need:
>>>
>>> echo #undef USE_PREINV_DIVREM_1 >> ..\config.h
>>> echo #define USE_PREINV_DIVREM_1 1 >> ..\config.h
>>>
>>> Case, do you want to try this out, and if it works on 32 and 64 bit
>>> builds, we'll call this problem fixed for now? Of course a more robust
>>> solution would grep the assembly files and see what symbols are
>>> available, etc.
> Just curious - why do you both #undef and #define to 0? Shouldn't
> #undef be sufficient?
Including the #define ... 0 lines causes errors. With the following,
all tests pass for 32-bit/pentium3, 32-bit/core2, 64-bit/K8, and
64-bit/core2, and using both VS2008 and VS2010.



echo #undef HAVE_NATIVE_mpn_mod_1c >> ..\config.h
echo #undef HAVE_NATIVE_mpn_divrem_1c >> ..\config.h
echo #define USE_PREINV_DIVREM_1 1 >> ..\config.h


Case

>
> Case
>>>
>> I'll try that tonight.
>> Case
>>> Bill.
>>>
>>> On 4 October 2012 13:41, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> This should work, but we should actually be appending #undefs for all
>>>> the extra symbols in those files that get deleted (not for the ones
>>>> that get replaced by generics of course).
>>>>
>>>> This probably means going through each directory for each arch,
>>>> looking at the .asm files that are listed in make.bat (which get
>>>> deleted) and adding #undefs for all the extra symbols.
>>>>
>>>> Bill.
>>>>
>>>> On 4 October 2012 04:07, Case Van Horsen <cas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Ah, I see. I'm slowly catching up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps the problem is that the .asm files don't all provide the same
>>>>>> symbols. Some may provide one of the symbols, others both.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The general configure yoga in the *nix side of things culls all the
>>>>>> symbols to figure out which HAVE_NATIVE's to set probably. Because
>>>>>> this is hard to do on Windows, the complication is "avoided" by using
>>>>>> the generic files.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the solution is to simply have make.bat purge the
>>>>>> HAVE_NATIVE_DIVREM_1c from the config.h file. This should always work.
>>>>>> In fact it is probably sufficient to simply append #undef
>>>>>> HAVE_NATIVE_DIVREM_1c and #define HAVE_NATIVE_DIVREM_1c 0 to the file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You got it! I have attached a new make.bat file that appends the
>>>>> appropriate #undef's to the end of config.h. "make check" passes for a
>>>>> 64-bit/K8 build and a 32-bit/pentium3 build.
>>>>>
>>>>> Case
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4 October 2012 00:22, Brian Gladman <b...@gladman.plus.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Bill Hart
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 12:19 AM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In config.h which it says is generated by gen_config_h.bat, it has:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #define HAVE_NATIVE_mpn_divrem_1c 1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is why it is expecting to find that symbol.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because gen_config_h.bat is a *** Visual Studio build file *** that 
>>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>> 'borrowed'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And the Visual Studio build does provide this symbol.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Brian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups
>>>>>>> "mpir-devel" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>> mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "mpir-devel" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "mpir-devel" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "mpir-devel" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to