-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Hart
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 11:11 PM
To: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] MPIR 2.6.0 alpha1 released
On 12 October 2012 23:06, Brian Gladman <b...@gladman.plus.com> wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Bill Hart
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 10:58 PM
To: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] MPIR 2.6.0 alpha1 released
[snip]
There are a couple more instances of _MSC_VER guards in mpirxx.h. Did
you only mean to change two of them?
========================
No, I meant to do all of them - I'll go through this again.
OK, I believe there are two more instances.
By the way, I have been going through the tests that use config.h and I
have
done about ten of them so far and I haven't found even one that actually
needs config.h on Windows (i.e the test compiles and runs when this
include
is omitted).
Well, we can try removing them and adding them back in if they are
actually needed. Probably they were only added for this specific
problem, which we've now resolved by simply excluding the relevant
code on Linux.
=============================
Ok, I'll go through them and take them out if they are not needed on
Windows. You can then test is this breaks the tests on *nix.
On the print format issue for mp_limb_t, mp_limb_unsigned_t, intmax_t and
uintmax_t, mp_bitcnt_t, ... should we add format specifiers (or macros) in
gmp_h.in where these types are defined?
Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
