Hi list,

Why do low-income kids, especially children of African and American Indian 
descent, fail to thrive in the Minneapolis Public Schools?  Do we need to fix 
the schools, or do we need to fix the kids, their parents, and communities of 
color?

I am not saying that all of the Minneapolis Public School parents are doing a 
good job of parenting.  Some are not doing a good job.  However, a strategy 
based on fixing the kids, their parents, and communities of color is bound to 
fail.

Are the schools doing a good job serving a "diverse" student population?  I 
say "no."

Can we eliminate most of the academic achievement gap between black and white 
kids, without lowering standards for kids who are now getting a good 
education? I say "yes."
To do this, one must identify the biggest obstacles to closing the gap, which 
are: incoherent curricula, ability-grouping practices, and a high 
concentration of inexperienced teachers and large class sizes in schools that 
serve poor, predominantly black neighborhoods.

The importance of institutional, school-based causes of poor student 
performance is indicated by a study about "teacher efficacy" done by the 
Minneapolis Public Schools less than two years ago.  According to the 
district's director of research, Dave Heistad, about 40% of the variability 
in academic achievement test scores can be attributed to teacher efficacy.  
The measure of "teacher efficacy" that is used in these type of studies is 
years of teaching experience plus relevant training and certification.  
Teaching experience is the biggest factor.

What about poverty, parental involvement, school attendance, student 
mobility, and so forth?  There is certainly a correlation, that is, a 
statistical association between these factors and student achievement.  But 
any student of statistics should know the difference between correlation and 
a cause-and-effect relationship.  Poverty, parental involvement and other 
extra-school factors do play a role, but they are greatly exaggerated by 
school officials.

There is a difference between rationalization and explanation.  The 
Minneapolis Board of Education prefers to rationalize.

There is one candidate for school board this year who is offering 
explanations: Evelyn Eubanks.  I am biased (I am not a Star-Tribune 
reporter).  I am also treasurer of the Eubanks for School Board Committee.  

I support Evelyn's candidacy because she can explain why the schools are 
failing our kids.  Evelyn has been involved with the schools as a parent and 
parent-student advocate since 1983.  For more information about Evelyn and 
the perspective of fixing the schools that we share, go to my web site at 
<http://educationright.tripod.com>      
    
-Doug Mann
Kingfield
   
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to