In a message dated 12/6/2001 8:35:24 PM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
>  I think that it's really sad when we need to blame parents for the failure
>  of the public schools.  Have I been deluded, or is education the
>  function of the public schools?  How many parents are knowledgeable
>  in methods of reading and phonics instruction?  And why should they
>  be?  Teachers go to college for five years to learn how to teach. [snip]

Well said!  

I was a Minneapolis public school parent and Mr. Mom to a couple of kids 
during the 1980s.  Both children were designated as "gifted."  I had no 
complaints about the quality of education they received. I also put in some 
hours as a classroom volunteer at Longfellow Elementary (class size 30).  
Household income > 40K / year.  Call me Mr. White Privilege.

Back in the good 'ole days (1980s), I was aware that ability-grouping was 
being done in grades 3 and up.  I didn't like that. I figured that the 
non-gifted kids were being shortchanged.  But I was blissfully unaware of the 
real impact it was having. It didn't motivate me to join the NAACP, carry a 
picket sign outside of 807 NE Broadway, or read scads of books related to 
K-12 education. 

When I became a Minneapolis Public School parent again in the 1990s, I 
trusted the Minneapolis School System.  I expected my child would get roughly 
the same quality of education I had come to expect as a parent in the 1980s. 
However, I was shocked and outraged by what was being done to my kid and a 
lot of his class mates, and I couldn't get the district to put a stop to it.  
Call me Mr. White Trash.

One issue was reading instruction.  We don't have effective reading 
instruction in most of the schoolrooms. It is a fact that we do not. Why is 
this so? Could there be a problem with the curriculum and learning strategies 
employed in the schoolrooms? 

The school board and its apologists on this list respond to every criticism 
of the schools, constructive or otherwise, by pointing a finger at those bad 
parents.  Anyone who says the schools could do a much better job of educating 
our kids is a "school basher."  Anyone who points out that important 
educational resources are not equitably distributed is a "school basher," 
and, of course, an attorney for those bad parents.

And there is the "culture of poverty" theory, which explains the academic 
achievement gap between blacks and whites, and between the poor and non-poor 
as THE effect of what happens outside of the schools.  The distribution of 
educational resources, curriculum, ability-grouping and everything else that 
the board is responsible for has little or no effect on how the kiddies turn 
out, or so the argument goes.  

The culture of poverty theory helps the school board justify keeping things 
the way they are, in and outside of a courtroom setting.  The gist of it was 
clearly articulated in a SW Journal column, and again, with considerable 
elaboration, in a recent post to this list by the writer of that SW Journal 
column.  By the way, this isn't personal.  It's part of a debate about public 
policy.     

I will close this message with a quote from a book that was published 68 
years ago.  It is strange how little has changed since then:

"As another has well said, to handicap a student by teaching him that his 
black face is a curse and that his struggle to change his condition is 
hopeless is the worst sort of lynching. It kills one's aspirations and dooms 
him to vagabondage and crime.  It is strange, then, that the friends of truth 
and the promoters of freedom have not risen up against the present propaganda 
in the schools and crushed it.  This crusade is much more important than the 
anti-lynching movement, because there would be no lynching if it did not 
start in the schoolroom.  Why not exploit, enslave, or exterminate a class 
that everybody is taught to regard as inferior?" (Woodson, Carter, 1933, The 
MIS-Education of the Negro, p. 3)

-Doug Mann, Kingfield

Doug Mann for School Board
<http://educationright.tripod.com> 
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to