Dave Piehl wrote: >I've heard from a few folks who say that the bridge >design in question was recently pulled from >consideration, but I haven't been able to find out >why, or what the "substitute" will be. >
> >For those of you interested in this issue, you can get the minutes from the Public >Advisory Committee (neighborhoods, etc.) and the Technical Advisory Committee >(engineers, architects, etc.) in EXCRUCIATING detail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Warning: this is a FAT file of the minutes from both committees for the last 3.5 >years. Erin Armstrong will also send you pictures, maps, and a lot of other assorted >details. > Re: this screed from Piehl, the bridge design did not "dissappear." There were two, one was chosen. When the PAC and TAC finish their work in December of this year, the materials go to the County Commissioners and the Mpls. City Council for debate. WizardMarks, Central > > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free >http://sbc.yahoo.com >_______________________________________ >Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy >Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: >http://e-democracy.org/mpls > _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
