Bob Fine voted to support John Erwin's amendment. He didn't take it as a friendly amendment as it was a resolution regarding the plan, not the use agreement, so it was the wrong place. You know this, you were there, you heard it for yourself. So your statement is not only incorrect, it appears to be deliberate. Deliberate and designed to mislead people about Bob Fine. You could respond by saying you didn't call him anti-gay, you just suggested that Bernstein would be more concerned about discrimination. Please be honest. Nikki Carlson Linden Hills -----Original Message----- From: Eva Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think it's unfortunate that Bob Fine won reelection. His reluctance to take John Erwin's amendment to explicitly state the agreement with De La Salle must include a non-discrimination clause spoke volumes. I'm rather surprised that Stonewall endorsed Fine. Bernstein in my view would be more concerned about discrimination against gays and also church/state separation with the deal with De La Salle. REMINDERS: 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[email protected] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
