The right of privacy is not guaranteed or stipulated in our constitution, nor do any of my posts claim it is. In fact, the question of whether or not citizens do, or should, have the right to privacy is often hotly debated and forms the basis of arguements both for and against issues, such as abortion, sexual behavior, etc. My point is not that the right to privacy is guaranteed by our constitution. Personally I believe that citizens should enjoy this right, and believe it should be applied consistently. I'm also aware that some do not share my point of view, and I respect that. My point is about people who invoke the right to privacy arguement when it supports their position, then conveniently ignore it when it doesn't; I believe this smoking ban debate is an example of the latter. Feel free to disagree with me, but please don't change the subject.
Peter Surmak Linden Hills REMINDERS: 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[email protected] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
