Only if you want to list all the bells and whistles.
   I was referring to concept, not  implementation details.






"Richard Tsujimoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-Wien.AC.AT> on
06/21/2002 04:15:52 PM

Please respond to "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent by:    "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


To:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:    Re: MQ vs Connect Direct


That's a stretch.  How does email support XA coordination with data bases?
How does email support grouping/segmenting messages?  How does messaging
support multi-levels of confirmation of delivery/arrival?  How about
clustered queues?  Need I go on?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Weinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: MQ vs Connect Direct


In concept,  messaging is nothing more than e-mail between programs.





"Roberto Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-Wien.AC.AT> on
06/20/2002 04:36:06 PM

Please respond to "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent by:    "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


To:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:    Re: MQ vs Connect Direct


... designed as an e-mail system...?,

mqcommit, mqrollback, get(msgid), get(correlid), get(priority), mqalias,
model queues, triggers, channel priority, cluster managers, etc. etc, etc,
etc...

all of this is so more than an e-mail system.

Another option is consider Connect-Direct versus Tivoli Data Exchange (no
Tivoli framework required)

Regards.


---------------------------------------------------------------
Roberto Oscar Sanchez - Arquitecto de Sistemas Centrales
Banco Galicia - Gerencia de Sistemas - Arquitectura Corporativa
Peron 537 - Piso 3 'A' - C1038AAK - 6329-5349/5346
Buenos Aires - Argentina - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------




                    Ronald Weinger
                    <rweinger@METLI       Para:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    FE.COM>               cc:
                    Enviado por:          Asunto:      Re: MQ vs Connect
Direct
                    MQSeries List
                    <MQSERIES@AKH-W
                    ien.AC.AT>


                    20/06/2002
                    15.50
                    Por favor,
                    responda a
                    MQSeries List





Without some value-added functonality, MQSeries will lose.
Connect Direct was designed as  a file transfer system. MQSeries was
designed as an e-mail system. If you want head-to-head, look at
CommerceQuest e-Adapter vs Connect Direct.





"Steve Sacho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-Wien.AC.AT> on 06/20/2002
02:14:44 PM

Please respond to "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent by:    "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


To:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:    Re: MQ vs Connect Direct



I'm aware of the unfortunate misconception of MQ as a glorified and costly
FTP, but this is precisely the area in which it's being challenged -
Connect Direct is seen as a viable alternative when it's just a file
transfer role that's being considered. My question was then as a
head-to-head file transfer solution, what's the knock-out punch for MQ vs.
CD, if any?






                            philip.distefano@JPMCH

                            ASE.COM                  To:

                            Sent by: "MQSeries       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                            List"                    T

                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]   cc:

                            AT>                      Subject:

                                                     Re: MQ vs Connect

                            06/20/2002 10:15 AM      Direct

                            Please respond to

                            "MQSeries List"







Connect Direct is a file transfer system... Why do you want to compare them
? CD uses TCP/IP, or SNA (LU6 or LU0) Its very fast using LU0.






Steve_Sacho@COUN To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TRYWIDE.COM cc:
Sent by: Subject: MQ vs Connect Direct
MQSERIES@akh-wie
n.ac.at


06/20/2002 12:07
PM
Please respond
to MQSERIES





Anyone have a brief comparison of MQSeries vs. Connect Direct (from
Sterling)?

Thanks,

Steve
Anyone have a brief comparison of MQSeries vs. Connect Direct (from
Sterling)?

Thanks,

Steve




This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended
as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial
instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made
herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its
subsidiaries and affiliates.

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive






Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive




Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Reply via email to