You need to say email to make your management understand? Nuff said. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Beinert, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: Re: MQ vs Connect Direct
> Ronald is right. Basically MQ is reliable program to program e-mail. > The rest is bells and whistles. Not stuff I am willing to live without, but > when I have to explain MQ to management that has never heard of it, > "reliable program to program e-mail" gets them to first base. > > Bill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Tsujimoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MQ vs Connect Direct > > > That's a stretch. How does email support XA coordination with data bases? > How does email support grouping/segmenting messages? How does messaging > support multi-levels of confirmation of delivery/arrival? How about > clustered queues? Need I go on? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ronald Weinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:15 AM > Subject: Re: MQ vs Connect Direct > > > In concept, messaging is nothing more than e-mail between programs. > > > > > > "Roberto Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-Wien.AC.AT> on > 06/20/2002 04:36:06 PM > > Please respond to "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent by: "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: Re: MQ vs Connect Direct > > > ... designed as an e-mail system...?, > > mqcommit, mqrollback, get(msgid), get(correlid), get(priority), mqalias, > model queues, triggers, channel priority, cluster managers, etc. etc, etc, > etc... > > all of this is so more than an e-mail system. > > Another option is consider Connect-Direct versus Tivoli Data Exchange (no > Tivoli framework required) > > Regards. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Roberto Oscar Sanchez - Arquitecto de Sistemas Centrales > Banco Galicia - Gerencia de Sistemas - Arquitectura Corporativa > Peron 537 - Piso 3 'A' - C1038AAK - 6329-5349/5346 > Buenos Aires - Argentina - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Ronald Weinger > <rweinger@METLI Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FE.COM> cc: > Enviado por: Asunto: Re: MQ vs Connect > Direct > MQSeries List > <MQSERIES@AKH-W > ien.AC.AT> > > > 20/06/2002 > 15.50 > Por favor, > responda a > MQSeries List > > > > > > Without some value-added functonality, MQSeries will lose. > Connect Direct was designed as a file transfer system. MQSeries was > designed as an e-mail system. If you want head-to-head, look at > CommerceQuest e-Adapter vs Connect Direct. > > > > > > "Steve Sacho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-Wien.AC.AT> on 06/20/2002 > 02:14:44 PM > > Please respond to "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent by: "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: Re: MQ vs Connect Direct > > > > I'm aware of the unfortunate misconception of MQ as a glorified and costly > FTP, but this is precisely the area in which it's being challenged - > Connect Direct is seen as a viable alternative when it's just a file > transfer role that's being considered. My question was then as a > head-to-head file transfer solution, what's the knock-out punch for MQ vs. > CD, if any? > > > > > > > philip.distefano@JPMCH > > ASE.COM To: > > Sent by: "MQSeries [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > List" T > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: > > AT> Subject: > > Re: MQ vs Connect > > 06/20/2002 10:15 AM Direct > > Please respond to > > "MQSeries List" > > > > > > > > Connect Direct is a file transfer system... Why do you want to compare them > ? CD uses TCP/IP, or SNA (LU6 or LU0) Its very fast using LU0. > > > > > > > Steve_Sacho@COUN To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > TRYWIDE.COM cc: > Sent by: Subject: MQ vs Connect Direct > MQSERIES@akh-wie > n.ac.at > > > 06/20/2002 12:07 > PM > Please respond > to MQSERIES > > > > > > Anyone have a brief comparison of MQSeries vs. Connect Direct (from > Sterling)? > > Thanks, > > Steve > Anyone have a brief comparison of MQSeries vs. Connect Direct (from > Sterling)? > > Thanks, > > Steve > > > > > This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended > as > an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial > instrument > or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data > and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and > are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made > herein > do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its > subsidiaries and affiliates. > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive > > > > > > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive > > > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive > > > > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
