As I recall, the speaker simply said that AMI just didn't catch on
like they thought it would.
Thomas Dunlap
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T.ATT.NET> cc:
Sent by: MQSeries Subject: Re: AMI elimination (was MQ
and DB2 stored procedures)
List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
N.AC.AT>
03/07/2003 03:22
AM
Please respond to
MQSeries List
Jim,
I was not able to attend the last Tech Conference. What was the
reason
given for elimination of the
AMI? Did they hint to adding any of the function, like Send/Receive
file, to current MQI?
Jim Ford wrote:
>Doesn't the SQL solution require AMI? At the recent conference IBM
>made it clear that AMI is on its way out. I wonder if the SQL
>extensions will use a different method.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Thomas Dunlap Chief Technology Officer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Themis, Inc. http://www.themisinc.com 1 (800) 756-3000
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided
in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
