Bobbee,
I believe the issue with runmqlsr breaking around 500 connections was
resolved in 5.3, and that this is why the recommendation about which
listener to use has changed for 5.3. The MP61.pdf has quite a bit
more in it about the Inetd vs. runmqlsr question than what I pasted into
the previous note.
-Tom
======================================================
Tom Schneider / IBM Global Services
(513) 274-4034
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
======================================================
Robert Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/30/2003 02:04 PM
Please respond to MQSeries List
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: inet2 vs MQ listener (UNIX)
The basics sound the same as it did in 5.2. What I recall is that around
500
and above connections, for some reason, the runmqlsr's knees started to
get
wobbely.
I am interested in this as there are discussions going on here to move to
runmqlsr after upgrading to 5.3. I just wanted to know if there was some
factual data behind the recomondation. They were having the QMGR down, bad
app keeps connecting and the strmqm comand cannot catch a breath problem.
just want to make sure that it was a god move except for the fact that IBM
invested some money in desktime to do a little improvement.
bobbee
>From: Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: inet2 vs MQ listener (UNIX)
>Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:53:43 -0400
>
>Bobbee,
>
>The MP61 support pack has a pdf "WebSphere MQ for AIX - Performance
>Evaluations" which has some explanation. It includes a number of
>comparisons of inetd and runmqlsr performance, and compares both methods
>between 5.2 and 5.3 as well. Section 2.2.3 of MP61 contains this
text:
>"the 'runmqlsr' has a reduced resource utilisation (one thread per
>connection vs. a process per connection for the 'inetd' listener and a
>smaller memory footprint), so is now the preferred method of running
>client channels and server channels."
>
>-Tom
>
>======================================================
>Tom Schneider / IBM Global Services
>(513) 274-4034
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>======================================================
>
>
>
>
>
>Robert Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent by: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>07/30/2003 09:53 AM
>Please respond to MQSeries List
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: inet2 vs MQ listener (UNIX)
>
>
>
>It lacks a reasonable explanation as to "Why".
>
> bobbee
>
>
> >From: "Voges, P. (Pieter)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: inet2 vs MQ listener (UNIX)
> >Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:18:07 +0200
> >
> >http://www.developer.ibm.com/tech/faq/individual/0,,2:28060,00.html
> >
> >Thank you
> >Pieter Voges
> >MQ Support
> >Nedcor Limited
> >Tel: (011) 881 4410
> >Sel: 083 6455 300
> >E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ><http://dotweb.it.nednet.co.za/link.asp?names=Voges,%20Pieter>
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Francois Van der Merwe1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: 30 July 2003 01:48
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: inet2 vs MQ listener (UNIX)
> >
> >
> >Whould you mind pointing me to where I can get this link. Thanks
> >
> >Francois van der Merwe
> >Senior IT Specialist: IBM MQSeries Certified Specialist, Solutions
Expert
>&
> >Developer
> >IBM, Cape Town, South Africa
> >+27 (0)82 556 9467 / +27 (0)21 402 5597
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Voges, P.
> > (Pieter)" To:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
> > COM> Subject: Re: inet2 vs
MQ
> >listener (UNIX)
> > Sent by: MQSeries
> > List
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > N.AC.AT>
> >
> >
> > 30/07/2003 12:30
> > Please respond to
> > MQSeries List
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >According to a link from IBM I found on their web page - Inetd is
better
> >prior to 5.3 and MQ listener is better from 5.3
> >
> >
> >Thank you
> >Pieter Voges
> >MQ Support
> >Nedcor Limited
> >Tel: (011) 881 4410
> >Sel: 083 6455 300
> >E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ><http://dotweb.it.nednet.co.za/link.asp?names=Voges,%20Pieter>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Francois Van der Merwe1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: 30 July 2003 11:15
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: inet2 vs MQ listener (UNIX)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Is the one better than the other?
> >
> >
> >Francois van der Merwe
> >
> >
> >Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided
in
> >the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
> >Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >This email and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential
and
> >proprietary information. This information is private and protected by
>law
> >and, accordingly, if you are not the intended recipient, you are
>requested
> >to delete this entire communication immediately and are notified that
any
> >disclosure, copying or distribution of or taking any action based on
this
> >information is prohibited.
> >
> >
> >Emails cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses.
>The
> >sender does not accept any liability or responsibility for any
> >interception, corruption, destruction, loss, late arrival or
>incompleteness
> >of or tampering or interference with any of the information contained
in
> >this email or for its incorrect delivery or non-delivery for whatsoever
> >reason or for its effect on any electronic device of the recipient.
> >
> >
> >If verification of this email or any attachment is required, please
>request
> >a hard-copy version.
> >
> >Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided
in
> >the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
> >Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
> >
> >********************
> >This email and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential
and
> >proprietary information. This information is private and protected by
>law
> >and, accordingly, if you are not the intended recipient, you are
>requested
> >to delete this entire communication immediately and are notified that
any
> >disclosure, copying or distribution of or taking any action based on
this
> >information is prohibited.
> >
> >Emails cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses.
>The
> >sender does not accept any liability or responsibility for any
> >interception, corruption, destruction, loss, late arrival or
>incompleteness
> >of or tampering or interference with any of the information contained
in
> >this email or for its incorrect delivery or non-delivery for whatsoever
> >reason or for its effect on any electronic device of the recipient.
> >
> >If verification of this email or any attachment is required, please
>request
> >a hard-copy version.
> >********************
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
>the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
>Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
>
>Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
>the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
>Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
