Rafael Martinez Torres wrote: > On Valerio's patchs.... > > Sorry, these are newbie's questions I thougth under control, but two weeks > ago I left standby the test and now I have problems > > - mrtg-2.9.29-ipv6.diff and mrtg-10.0pre1 are not about the same patch. > > Please confirm this point
Actually, the IPv6 code in mrtg-2.9.29-ipv6.diff (final version) and mrtg-2.10.0pre1 should be exactly the same. But probably there are other changes between 2.9.29 and 2.10.0pre1 apart from IPv6... > - Sorry, I'm a bit confused with my versions: > What should I do to make mrtg-2.[9|10].X IPv6 available ? > (Now I have read the ipv6.html under doc ). It should be enough to pass --enable-ipv6 to cfgmaker and put EnableIPv6: yes in mrtg.cfg. e.g. cfgmaker --enable-ipv6 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:760:4::1] BUT: > cfgmaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:618:10:2a03:205:1cff:fe00:1df0] --enableipv6 > > Error: can't resolve "[2001" to IP address > > (BTW, Valerio, try this address. It is a net-snmp PC ...) > > It doesn't catch the IPv6 address well. The parser seems to fail...I'm > sure is my mistake. > Please, confirm me... I ran it with DNS entry, but don't remember...I'm > destreassed :-|. You are seeing the bug I mentioned in my email to the list earlier today. In all versions, numeric IPv6 addresses work only when you specify IPv6 options. So [EMAIL PROTECTED]:760:4::1]:161 works, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:760:4::1] doesn't. You can apply this patch, which fixes the bug: http://www.uniroma3.6net.garr.it/mrtg/patch-mrtg-2.10.0pre1-numericv6 Let me know if you try it. Regards, Lorenzo -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg-developers
