Let's just commit -- we are small enough and agile enough that let's just open up the flood gates.
We should let people chime in and respect them when they do should they have an objection, but I'm fine with just committing. It's worked for me on all my other projects (Nutch, Tika, Lucene, OODT, SIS, Gora, Lucy)... Cheers, Chris On Mar 28, 2011, at 7:04 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > Hey folks, > > It was my understanding that in the Hadoop community, all patches had to get > a +1 on the review before being committed, even those from long-time > committers on the project. The new committer guide [1] suggests that being a > "committer" on a project implies that you should commit first. > > How would we like to go about this here? > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html > > Thanks, > - Aaron ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
