I don't have a strong opinion and I think for something like mrunit it makes
sense to default to commit. I like review first for larger commits, but I'm
happy to leave it to the individual's best judgement.

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Aaron Kimball <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> It was my understanding that in the Hadoop community, all patches had to
> get
> a +1 on the review before being committed, even those from long-time
> committers on the project. The new committer guide [1] suggests that being
> a
> "committer" on a project implies that you should commit first.
>
> How would we like to go about this here?
>
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html
>
> Thanks,
> - Aaron
>



-- 
Eric Sammer
twitter: esammer
data: www.cloudera.com

Reply via email to