On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <[email protected]> wrote: > There's nothing to propose to the Incubator. First off, on all Incubator > projects I've been involved with (to date I think around 7) we've definitely > had 2 wikis. I'm not suggesting something besides that. What I'm suggesting > is that we actively develop Incubator podling reports on the Incubator wiki > instead of flush the final report there from our own wiki (which defeats the > purpose of the Incubator wiki report area). If reports are just to be flushed > (which in the end they are, to the board, as reported by the IPMC chair), > then why even have a report wiki? The Incubator could simply accept text > files from all of the podlings? > > Anyhoo, the model has been working fine in MRUNIT, because my blathering, and > I was just trying to point out IMO, I think it's confusing from a Wiki > Version Control Perspective to actively develop the Incubator reports on the > MRUNIT wiki and then magically flush them onto the Incubator podling report > portion of its wiki. That's all I was saying.
I don't consider it "blathering", I honestly appreciate your feedback. I also agree it could be confusing, but at this point changing the process will take someone interested enough that they are wiling to effect the change. (so chalk it up to lazyness on my part ;-) ). All the best, Patrick
