Guys, Not sure what we're VOTE'ing on here? I would suggest whoever has the cycles simply roll an RC (as desired) and throw it up for a VOTE. VOTE'ing to release though -- no need :)
Cheers, Chris On Mar 15, 2012, at 1:13 PM, Jim Donofrio wrote: > We will hold off the 0.9.0 release until we resolve MRUNIT-66, > MRUNIT-68, and MRUNIT-61 for 0.9.0, right? > > On 03/15/2012 03:55 PM, Brock Noland wrote: >> We are voting on a proposed 0.9.0 release. Jim said it best "I think >> we have enough new features/bug fixes: mapreduce Combiner, custom >> counter checking, improved passing of the conf, better support for >> java/other serializations, better error messages, deprecated string >> methods, AssertionError's instead of RuntimeException's, separate >> source, binary distributions." >> >> The proposal is to do a release with the above features and to call it 0.9.0. >> >> I am +1 on this proposal. >> >> Brock >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
