OK, since 1.0.0 release was "planned" I thought we'd have to vote for a 0.9.0. My mistake, I will just do the RC then.
Brock On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <[email protected]> wrote: > Guys, > > Not sure what we're VOTE'ing on here? I would suggest whoever has > the cycles simply roll an RC (as desired) and throw it up for a VOTE. > VOTE'ing to release though -- no need :) > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Mar 15, 2012, at 1:13 PM, Jim Donofrio wrote: > >> We will hold off the 0.9.0 release until we resolve MRUNIT-66, >> MRUNIT-68, and MRUNIT-61 for 0.9.0, right? >> >> On 03/15/2012 03:55 PM, Brock Noland wrote: >>> We are voting on a proposed 0.9.0 release. Jim said it best "I think >>> we have enough new features/bug fixes: mapreduce Combiner, custom >>> counter checking, improved passing of the conf, better support for >>> java/other serializations, better error messages, deprecated string >>> methods, AssertionError's instead of RuntimeException's, separate >>> source, binary distributions." >>> >>> The proposal is to do a release with the above features and to call it >>> 0.9.0. >>> >>> I am +1 on this proposal. >>> >>> Brock >>> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > -- Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
