Since the question came up already, but I don't know if a decision has been made so far:
Is adding a qml equivalent inside a class the model to use to expose enums to qml if needed (like Werner did it for AccidentalType and AccidentalRole)? About testing the qml enum (Werner asked for it). I tried this in my PR1931: QVERIFY((int)BarLineType::NORMAL == (int)BarLine::QmlBarLineType::NORMAL); QVERIFY((int)BarLineType::DOUBLE == (int)BarLine::QmlBarLineType::DOUBLE); (and so on) Is adding a simple if chain to compare every currently existing member of an enum with its qml enum equivalent) a sensible way of testing? There seems to be no way of knowing how much elements an enum has. Heuchi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ Mscore-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
