I think that suggestion does not really make sense given what I thinkl you
are actually trying to do.  Your problem is simply that you chose the wrong
function to use to add notes.  if you care about line, you should use a
function that works with line, simple as that.  You won't have to calculate
accidentals yourself at all - that is all handled for you if you do what I
suggested.

Marc

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:01 AM Jim Newton <jimka.i...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It sounds like you pretty much understand the problem.
>
> If I add a note, and then later in the function I scan over the notes in
> the
> measure, I might encounter one I added.  It has line=0 on it, which is
> wrong, and I'd like to skip that note.  But I don't see any indication on
> the note that it is in such a state.  There must be something which
> distinguishes this note from one which is REALLY on line=0.  I could of
> course make a over-engineered solution to "remember" which notes I added,
> or
> perhaps don't actually add the notes, but rather build a data structure of
> notes I intend to add, then add them all at the end.  I'd like to avoid
> such
> a complicated solution.
>
> I'll take a look at noteValForPosition().  One issue I saw last time I
> looked at that was that I didn't know how to calculate the correct
> accidentals.  With my approach it is a bit easier.  I find a note on the
> line I want; ask that note what is its pitch, then create a new note with
> that pitch +/- n*12 to shift for octave differences.
> The case of accidentals was confusing to me because the note might be Bb
> because there is a Bb in the key signature, and it might be Bb because of
> an
> accidental explicitly on the note or one earlier in the measure.  The kink
> is that I need to call addNote(), and also updateLine(); that seems to do
> the trick.
>
> Again to emphasise Marizio suggested to use tpc, because it will do this
> calculation for me.  So, I'd like to understand how that might work.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://dev-list.musescore.org/note-not-yet-ready-tp7579475p7579501.html
> Sent from the MuseScore Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Mscore-developer mailing list
> Mscore-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
Mscore-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

Reply via email to