True.  Only the tuplet issue is 2.1-specific as far as I know.  I haven't
tried the fix given by https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/pull/2880 but
I'm hoping that merging that and reverting
https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/pull/2861 would do the job.  I need
to get a 3.0 build going again, I guess this weekend I'll do that.

Marc

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:48 PM Lasconic <[email protected]> wrote:

> The majority of the issues you listed applies to master too. It would then
> make sense to fix them in master first. No?
>
> lasconic
>
> 2017-05-24 23:37 GMT+02:00 Marc Sabatella <[email protected]>:
>
>> I guess my reason for talking about improving our process is to make it
>> so if/when the time comes to consider a 2.1.2 as well, we don't put it off
>> because our process is still too cumbersome.  But I'm OK with not crossing
>> that bridge until we get to it.
>>
>> I will see about submitting PR's on 2.2 for the issues I feel comfortable
>> fixing myself.
>>
>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:16 PM Lasconic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> So we are not talking about improving our process here. We are talking
>>> about a 2.1.1.
>>> Let's not overthink it. We have a 2.2 branch, I'm ready to merge any fix
>>> in this branch. We just need to make sure we have nightlies and testers.
>>>
>>> lasconic
>>>
>>> 2017-05-24 22:45 GMT+02:00 Marc Sabatella <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> I wonder if maybe there couldn't be a more streamlined process for
>>>> purely bug fix releases?  Not every release necessarily requires a lengthy
>>>> announcement or a newsletter, maybe not all require updating apps, not all
>>>> have translation implications, etc.
>>>>
>>>> Because absolutely I agree we shouldn't divert more attention from 3.0
>>>> development than necessary.  I think that given the magnitude of the
>>>> changes coming for 3.0, having 2.1 made sense even though it was a pretty
>>>> big release.  I would hope to not have another anything like that before
>>>> 3.0, so if 2.1 took 20 days, maybe we see how we can make 2.1.x releases in
>>>> under a week, with more people helping out so that it isn't a full time
>>>> commitment for anyone.
>>>>
>>>> Ideally it would be easier to have more regular bug fix updates.  It's
>>>> actually quite encouraging that the half dozen or so issues I mentioned are
>>>> essentially *all* that has been reported in the several weeks since the
>>>> release.  So if we did a 2.1.1 in June, I would doubt we'd need a 2.1.2
>>>> this year.  Depending on the status of 3.0, maybe eventually we hit the
>>>> 2.0.3 bugs that didn't quite make the list for 2.1, but it's an easier call
>>>> to make if we can find a way to do it without taking as much effort as we
>>>> spend now - or at least, if we can better distribute the work.
>>>>
>>>> At the very least, what if someone else were to own the coordinating
>>>> community builds for Linux, portable apps, etc?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:23 PM byan61 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This sounds like QA issue.
>>>>> I am relatively new to MuseScore development and releasing process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Normally software releases go through following stages:
>>>>> Alpha (internal testing)
>>>>> Beta (external/user testing)
>>>>> Final release
>>>>>
>>>>> All obvious regressions should have been discovered in the Alpha and
>>>>> Beta
>>>>> releases, and fixed before the final release is made.
>>>>> I do not see any Beta release announcements for MuseScore 2.1.  Please
>>>>> correct me if I am wrong.
>>>>> We should have Beta release(s) about 3-4 weeks before making the final
>>>>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>> http://dev-list.musescore.org/Releases-and-packaging-tp7580247p7580250.html
>>>>> Sent from the MuseScore Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mscore-developer mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mscore-developer mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mscore-developer mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mscore-developer mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Mscore-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

Reply via email to