On 2013-04-18 14:32, Ivanko B wrote:
> On some LINUX machine , it has even showed UTF8 to be 3 (!) times as
> faster then the others [and Ansistring included as well ] :)

Clearly not just Linux. My initial test was under FreeBSD 9.1 (64-bit).

The result below is from Windows 2000 (32-bit) running in a VirtualBox
VM. Still faster than UTF-16 and UTF-32.

----------------------------------------------------
Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.

Z:\unicode_speed>project1
UTF-8:  0 entries in 000:00:00:00.000512
UTF-8 (fpGUI):  0 entries in 000:00:00:00.000976
UTF-16: 0 entries in 000:00:00:00.001932
UTF-32: 0 entries in 000:00:00:00.001767

----------------------------------------------------


Test project was compiled with compiler options:  -gl -O-



Regards,
  - Graeme -

-- 
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
mseide-msegui-talk mailing list
mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk

Reply via email to