Hallo Ivanko, Du schriebst am Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:37:24 +0500:
> Just have the compiler shift the (imaginary) base address > ========= > It may break connections with numbering in real-world task. What for > to do it if keeping this connection doesn't slow down performance ? Oh, you count the bits of a double word starting with 0 at every word? Or rather, every byte? Why not at every nibble? You regard LastDecade: ARRAY [9] OF anything; as more connected "with numbering in real-world" than LastDecade: ARRAY [2004..2013] OF anything; then? Wasn't it you who pleaded _for_ arbitrary index ranges? -- -- (Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem) ----------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
