Hallo Michael, Du schriebst am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:50:10 +0100:
> > The Pascal "with" statement was introduced with the _explicit_ > > intention to allow just the mentioned optimization, > > Since that time compiler seem to have done their homework and can do > without private lessons :-) Kind of. There _are_ situations where the compiler optimization does something unwanted or even introduces errors. Second guessing another one's intentions isn't even easy for humans, much less for software. And then, it's a little bit funny to read a statement against "source code optimization" from a C programmer, when it is often an expressed concern by such to keep their source code as optimized for their compiler as possible... But anyway, the Pascal style "with" allows you to keep your source free from naming clutter when the context is clear. If you don't think a "with" makes the code easier to understand, simply _don't use it_. It is _not_ required in any way. -- -- (Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem) ----------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
