On Friday 15 November 2013 13:42:02 Michael Schnell wrote: > On 11/15/2013 10:06 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote: > > How do you suggest one should solve the Pascal "with" problem that it is > > possible that an additional field in the "with" record can hide already > > used names in existing "with" statements with that record? > > +1 > > IMHO there is no decent way to handle the "with ambiguity" in Pascal. > The Oberon "with alia" looks a lot more obvious. > > But IMHO it is better to avoid the "with" keyword altogether
Why? Do you never work with variant records? There and with records generally "with" is a good aid to structure the code. Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
