Totally agree with you. :)
I think that using LLVM is a right choice.
2015-01-23 18:30 GMT+01:00 Martin Schreiber <mse00...@gmail.com>:
> On Friday 23 January 2015 17:20:55 Julio Jiménez wrote:
> > BTW, GCC 4.9 vs LLVM CLang 3.5 at Phoronix
> >
> What I saw up to now from LLVM backend is really impressive. I also like
> the
> concept with the LLVM bitcode input because it enables to use multiple
> cores
> for the MSElang frontend and the unit optimisations and machine code
> generation stages by means of OS multitasking without error-prone in
> process
> multi-threading.
>
> Martin
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
> _______________________________________________
> mseide-msegui-talk mailing list
> mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
>
--
Julio Jiménez Borreguero
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
mseide-msegui-talk mailing list
mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
