Thanks for both the response and the effort.

On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 20:29 -0700, Chris Liechti <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:24:35 +0200
> From: Chris Liechti <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] new processor, msp430-gdbproxy puzzlement
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> 
> Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> > [f1xx] works well. Placing a MSP430f2131 in it, however, results in
> > msp430-gdbproxy throwing out a message "error:     msp430: Could not
> > read device memory (6)".
> 
> the 2xx devices have a small differnece in the JTAG access. it is realy 
> small, but relavant enough to break JTAG access on 2xx devices, while 
> 1xx devices work with the old and new access method.
> 
> i have to do some clarifications, but i hope to update our backend in a 
> few days.
> 
> > This is all under linux, if that makes a difference.
> 
> nope, no difference
> 
> chris



************************************
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are proprietary and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender. Please note 
that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT Industries, Inc. The 
recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. ITT Industries accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this e-mail.
************************************

Reply via email to