Thanks for this summary, I was looking for this kind of infomation for weeks!
On Jan 10, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Peter Jansen wrote:
gcc-3.2.3 (mspgcc/gcc/gcc-3.3)
works,
compiles all our projects ok,
I think there is some fault with calls to pointers in R1
(which I have recently patched)
Maybe some very subtle fault with pointers to structures
selecting the correct offset.
gcc-3.3.6 (msp-gcc/gcc/gcc-3.4)
compiles ok,
makes bigger code, does not seem to use bit instruction for
'and #',
includes mods for C++
(could be back ported to gcc-3.2.3 quite easily)
does not have newer devices (1471,....)
Is this mean 3.3.6 is better than 3.2.3? # I would take larger code than wrong code. By the way I have back ported 3.2.3's device to 3.3.6, although I am not sure I did all of what needs to be done. Seems working at least for 430F1612.
mspgcc.patch
Description: Binary data
