KIMURA Shigenobu wrote:
Thanks for this summary, I was looking for this kind of infomation
for weeks!
On Jan 10, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Peter Jansen wrote:
gcc-3.2.3 (mspgcc/gcc/gcc-3.3)
works,
compiles all our projects ok,
I think there is some fault with calls to pointers in R1
(which I have recently patched)
Maybe some very subtle fault with pointers to structures
selecting the correct offset.
gcc-3.3.6 (msp-gcc/gcc/gcc-3.4)
compiles ok,
makes bigger code, does not seem to use bit instruction for
'and #',
includes mods for C++
(could be back ported to gcc-3.2.3 quite easily)
does not have newer devices (1471,....)
Is this mean 3.3.6 is better than 3.2.3?
# I would take larger code than wrong code.
By the way I have back ported 3.2.3's device to 3.3.6,
although I am not sure I did all of what needs to be done.
Seems working at least for 430F1612.
I use 3.2.3, I think the two bugs in 3.2.3 with structures and function
pointer calls are in 3.3.6 also.
--
Peter Jansen
___________________________________________________________________________
Australian Antarctic Division - Commonwealth of Australia
IMPORTANT: This transmission is intended for the addressee only. If you are not
the
intended recipient, you are notified that use or dissemination of this
communication is
strictly prohibited by Commonwealth law. If you have received this transmission
in error,
please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or by telephoning +61 3 6232
3209 and
DELETE the message.
Visit our web site at http://www.aad.gov.au/
___________________________________________________________________________
