On Nov 20, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Peter Bigot wrote: > Would you mind filing a bug report asking for this (prevent use of > USB-reserved memory on relevant devices), so I don't forget it? Thanks.
No problem, I'll do that. Shall I file two separate reports, with one asking to prevent mis-use of the USB RAM when the USB interface shall be used, and another asking for a way to return the USB RAM to the general pool if the USB interface won't be used? Or shall I combine both of those into a single report? I'm beginning to study the msp430f5529 linker scripts now, and they don't appear to define the existence of the USB RAM (0x1C00-0x23FF) at all. If I understand this correctly, does this mean that the linker won't try to place any general variables into the USB memory, and my current technique (hack?) of not allocating the USB endpoint buffers in C code and simply defining their symbol addresses in an assembler file is likely to work (even if it's not the ideal way to do this)? -- Mark J. Blair, NF6X <[email protected]> Web page: http://www.nf6x.net/ GnuPG public key available from my web page. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
