----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
Von: Peter Bigot
Gesendet am: 30 Dez 1899 00:00:00
>> (well, in theory, the ASM reference may be a
>> global assembly symbol instead of a number, but that wouldn't be of any
>> use)
>Why not? That's the planned approach for uniarch, where the declaration for
>P1IN would reference global symbol __P1IN which is resolved at the
>non-relocatable link stage. This reduces the number of libraries required
>by allowing chips that have the same register definitions, but at different
>addresses, to share an implementation. It also reduces (does not eliminate)
>the likelihood of errors from separate compilation with different header
>files.
I didn't say it is impossible, just that it does not make sense right now.
Why generating a reference to a reference? You could just omit the
asm then and directly use the available global symbol instead
(which does not exist right now anyway).
JMGross
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
