gmail filled in the wrong gcc-related mailing list; I've taken this back where it belongs.
However, if there are any folks on here who ever contributed to mspgcc in any material way, you may find yourself being asked to file such an assignment, if you haven't done so already. I think there are at least twenty names in the historical git repository that might have to be tracked down before FSF would accept the back end into gcc, and the updates for 430X support into binutils and gdb. Peter On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Peter Bigot <big...@acm.org> wrote: > I'm maintaining an out-of-tree back-end (Texas Instruments MSP430) > based on years of contributions from a variety of people, affecting > binutils, gcc, and gdb. Whether it can ever be merged (some of the > original contributors have disappeared), I'd like an assignment form > for what I've done so far and in the future so my own contributions > don't prevent this. Some of this was personal; some under an > employer; some as a contractor. Thanks. > > Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
