Hi, On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 12:27 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 09/13/2013 11:37 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > If we've got to that point then I may be able to assist in making that > > happen, but there were some concerns that those using the old packages > > may not be ready to move to the new ones right away - so it would be > > nice to hear some thoughts on that. Should we do it now, or wait a > > little while? > > Wait a little while. The base port is checked in, but a number of > optimizations are still pending. > Ok, sounds like a good plan. I'm not in any hurry - just want to be sure that we do it at the right time.
> > The gcc package obviously depends on the binutils package, so another > > issue was not wanting to upgrade the binutils package until a new gcc > > was ready since its very likely that the old gcc wouldn't work with the > > new binutils, > > Binutils is completely upstream at this point. If it does something > wrong we'd like to hear about it! > I'm sure its ok in itself - the only issue is whether a version of gcc thats as old as the hills and heavily patched would still build over it. So lets wait until the gcc part is ready too, and we can then upgrade both at approximately the same time. It doesn't sound like this is too far away now, Steve. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
