Not silly at all, I am willing to look at anything. The client is installed, I have a couple of the computers in my office that should be appearing but do not. Plus there are other deployments to these machines where this is not an issue. None of this makes any sense. :D
Just to add more confusion. The application that I’m deploying does show up in Software Center and if I install it, THEN it will show up under the status for that deployment. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 2:06 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments Silly question, but is the client installed on the ones that do not show up? You could have added records where the client is not installed. You would see them in the collection, but not in status messages, because they are not clients. In the collection view see if the client = yes and active = yes. I have a new collection with 31 members and if I go into that collection I see them all. When I check under deployment status for that software it shows success for 1/1 and that is it, the other 30 machines do not appear under any other category. On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Chris Carbone <chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com<mailto:chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com>> wrote: Yes, these exist in the limiting “All Workstations” collection. But just for the heck of it I just ran the update membership option. As for SQL query against the DB go, I do not have access to this which also means I cannot use ceviewer tool. I will try again to see if I can gain access to the db. Would sure help! ☺ Thanks for the suggestions. I already viewed the Colleval.log and nothing stuck out but I will look closer to see the logs generated from when these new collections were built. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] On Behalf Of Adam Juelich Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 10:51 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments Do they exist within the 'Limiting Collection?' Update membership of limiting collection and browse it to see if those Devices/Users exist within it. On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Chris Carbone <chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com<mailto:chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com>> wrote: All of these members are direct. I went into devices, found each computer, right clicked and added to collection. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] On Behalf Of Adam Juelich Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 9:23 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments Are the members of the Collection in there from a Direct Query, or otherwise? On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Chris Carbone <chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com<mailto:chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com>> wrote: Nobody else has ever heard of this issue before? We are currently on 1511 and I have a few deployments that are like this now where under deployment status most of the computers in that collection are not appearing. Yet if I go into that collection the computers do appear. From: Chris Carbone Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 8:45 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Strange issue with deployments Hello all, In the last week or so I have noticed now some new deployments are not seeing all the members in a collection. For example I have a new collection with 31 members and if I go into that collection I see them all. When I check under deployment status for that software it shows success for 1/1 and that is it, the other 30 machines do not appear under any other category. I tried recreating the collection and also the deployment. We did make a change with system discovery to only look at 1am each night for another issue but don’t think this change is related to this new problem. Anyone else seen this type of behavior and know where I can look? I searched and have not really seen any results coming up for this problem. Thanks in advance Chris This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately. This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately. This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately. This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.
