On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Alwin Henseler wrote:
> As for the significance of a year2k-bug on MSX: I doubt anything much
> will happen as a result of a MSX year2k-bug, simply because MSX's are
> probably used in very few, or non, 'critical' applications. There's
> surely not an airport anywhere that relies on MSX-computers for the
Well... We have here airplane comppany called Finnair. They used to use
Sony HB-G900p. Anyway they didn't controll traffic, but they used these
computers for secury and simulation training (Don't ask me, what that
means, but they said so) Anyway they did not use these computers anymore,
but they still have few ones with HBU-G900p U-MATIC interface, HBI-G900p
videotizer and Video-CD player.
> Think of something like a MSX computer up in the Russian MIR space
> station once (I don't know if it was a true story, but it sure looked
> nice, and why not?). And a large part of year2k-related problems lies
I have seen one bad quality B/W picture once in a MSX magazine. That does
not prove anything, but why someone would cheat us like that?
,_____.
_=_=_=_=!_MSX_!=_=_=_=_=_=_=_=_,
! A1ST ~--- - I ( o o o o o o )i
/--------------------------------`,
/ .::::::::::::::::::::::;::; ::::.,
/ :::.:.:.:::____________:::::!. -=- `,
~======================================
NYYRIKKI : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****