On Tue, 8 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [step]
> >IMO, the nicest would be a 4-neighbourhood for moving, attacking and dropping
> >energie and a 12-neighbourhood for looking (I'll explain further on). Tell me
> >if you don't agree.
>
> >I was thinking of one large energie-supply, since I didn't put shields in it
> >anyway, but perhaps this should be different. What's your opinion?
>
> Well, ok, "shield" may have been not the correct word, but I think a robot
> should be able to sustain a certain amount of damage, related to its energy
> supply, before it is brought down by an attack.
That is right. I didn't think of it as a different thing, but it could
be. I think that would be nice.
> looking & scanning]
> >> Ok, that could be equal to my proposal for the short range scan, while the
> >> long range scan will cost you turn...
> >Indeed, only I think you should be able to look at least one square further
> >than you can walk (12-neighbourhood):
> Hm, the argument in favour of the 12-neighbourhood (scan/look one step
> further than you can move) is ok, but I'm not very enthousiastic about
> the 12-nbh: it just doesn't look that good :-) I'd propose a 24-nbh
> (square) or a 20-nbh (more or less circular):
I agree. I prefer the 20-nbh, since it feels more natural to have a
circular range.
> PS. I've had a look at the CRobots homepage(lost the URL unfortunately).
> Looks pretty much like what we're trying to make here...
Eh, ok. Is that a problem? It is for pc, right?
Bye,
shevek
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
