> > get it via my MSX page (http://www.sci.kun.nl/marie/home/manuelbi/msx.html
>
> Thanks.
No problem! (I'll now really go home!)
> > I know you have top compiled, but I wondered how long it took to get it
> > compiled!
>
> In my 5x86 100MHz, about 1 minute...
I mean, including adaptions for Hi-Tech C.
> > > > How can I test the multi-user features?
> > > By now, only logging as different users (login as root, use,
> > > logout, login as user, use, logout, login as guest, use, logout, etc).
> > Aha. And when logged in, can another user login too?
>
> Of course not. UZIX doesn't have virtual terminals by now.
> You're wanting too much for now, Manuel... :)
I mean, not with virtual terminals, but just occupying the other terminal.
E.g. user1 logs in, and starts 2 background jobs. Then, he types somting as
"login user2", and user2 logs in. He can now also start bg jobs. When he does
top, he sees processes of user1 and user2! Can Uzix do this already?
> > By the way, I just tried running Uzix on fMSX 2.0 (Unix), and it hung if I
> > took more than 512kB RAM.
>
> WHEN it hangs? What you see on screen?
I see only:
Welcome to UZIX 0.1.2
[cursor]
> > When I don't, I get: Mounting root fs: [cursor]
> > What then? It seems to hang...
>
> Ihihihihih... fMSX is fudeba... :)
> I tested it in fMSX-DOS 1.6b2, CJS 1.0b, TR GT, TR ST, ACVS 2++,
> DDX 2.0 and others and it worked.
Hah, and not in fMSX 2.0! So it might be 'fudeba' indeed!
> There is no reason for UZIX hanging up because you have 512Kb RAM.
No, it crashed with MORE than 512 kB RAM.
> My GT has 512Kb RAM and doesn't crash when loading UZIX. Also, Daniel
> Caetano has 4Mb RAM and UZIX doesn't crash with him. Giovanni has 1Mb RAM
> and UZIX doesn't crash with him.
> I neved tried 512Kb RAM with fMSX-DOS... I'll do it. But I don't
> believe it will crash UZIX. It's nonsense.
My MSX2 at my parent's place has 512kB. I'll test it, but it will probably
work as normal.
> > Or does it just not work on fMSX?
>
> Works, but I noticed it becames instable... Even in CJS, UZIX is
> more stable...
> Well... Emulators... Argh...
Yeah, you're right. Just wanted to do some quick-testing... I have no MSX here
at the university.
Grtjs, Manuel ((m)ICQ UIN 41947405)
PS: MSX 4 EVER! (Questions? See: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/)
PPS: Visit my homepage at http://www.sci.kun.nl/marie/home/manuelbi/
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
